Terrorism in America

I think that it is very obvious that the overwhelming majority of Americans would agree that terrorist attacks in America are not a good thing. Just for the PC police, please note that I did not say all Americans feel that way. I do recognize that there are some radicalized individuals in America that are sympathetic to terrorists for some reason. However, the overwhelming majority of Americans would agree that preventing terrorist attacks in America is a good goal. Logically speaking, one of the best means to preventing terrorist attacks is to prevent terrorists from being able to enter America in the first place. If there were no terrorists in America, then it follows that they could not initiate an attack here, right? So how do you prevent terrorists from entering America? It is obvious that the first step is to know who is entering our country! I don’t want to belabor the obvious, but in addition, as a sovereign nation we have the right to deny entrance to our country to anyone. As a matter of fact, we have the requirement to deny entrance to our country to anyone who will try to conduct acts of terrorism here. So it is therefore obvious that we have both the right and the obligation to put rules in place governing who will be denied entrance, and we have the right and the obligation to enforce those rules in order to provide for the safety of our citizens from terrorist attacks. Inherent in this statement is the fact that a person that has not complied with these rules has no right to be in our country. If laws are not enforced, then there is no law, and all that is left is chaos and anarchy.

America has a history of welcoming immigrants into our country.  For the PC police, please note that I said welcoming immigrants. An immigrant is a person who is here legally after complying with our laws. Both Obama and Hillary express a disdain for our immigration laws. Both Obama and Hillary espouse the idea of admitting hundreds of thousands of people into our country without any reasonable verification of their backgrounds. In other words, both Obama and Hillary attach little or no importance to providing safety from terrorism for American citizens. For Obama and Hillary, playing politics has a higher importance than safety for American citizens. If we can’t verify who a person is, why in the world would we want to admit them into our country? If we can’t verify what kind of background a person has, why in the world should we admit them into our country? If we don’t know anything about a person, how can we verify if he or she is a terrorist?

Both Obama and Hillary have made empty claims that they can ‘vet’ these ‘refugees’, but all of our security people tell us that we can’t. Our security people tell us that some of the ‘refugees’ will be terrorists posing as refugees. Obama and Hillary both imply that there is no danger associated with admitting hundreds of thousands of people into our country with either inadequate or non-existent background checks. Do you believe them or do you believe our security experts? Are you willing to bet your life on it?

Look at the European nations. They have admitted large numbers of ‘refugees’ without adequate checks. Look at the results. There have been dozens of terrorist attacks and in Germany alone there were thousands of German women raped. Terrorists and rapists were loosed on the citizens. But Obama and Hillary claim that it will be different in America. Again, are you willing to bet your life on it?