I am really getting sick and tired of the blatant media bias. The first Trump/Hillary debate was just another showpiece of the blatant media bias against Trump and the ongoing coddling provided for Hillary by the media. Lester Holt started the whole thing with a blatant lie stating that the last few years have been a great economic recovery. Even an idiot can see that 1 to 2 % growth in the economy is not "great". Obama's administration is the first in American history that never exceeded 2% growth in any year. Under his leadership, the number of Americans in poverty has increased by millions, and the number on food stamps has grown even more. I addressed the statistics in a previous post, and will not repeat them in this post, but the point is that Lester Holt's opening statement about the 'rosy economic situation' was totally wrong. Now why did he make such a ludicrous statement? The answer to that question is obvious. Trump has been talking about taking actions which will help our economy to grow. Lester's intent was certainly intended to try to discredit Trump.
Lester Holt tried to tell you the listener that stop and frisk had been declared unconstitutional. This was another dead wrong assertion. The ruling which Lester was referring to had been in regard to how stop and frisk was being used. It was ruled to be constitutional policy.
Lester Holt tried to hit Trump with every issue he could find that MIGHT cause Trump problems. Lester Holt interrupted Trump several times and argued with him. Lester had nothing but powder puff questions for Hillary, and he never interrupted her or disagreed with her even when what she said was wrong. Hillary talked forever in a filibuster-type monologue and Lester let her have all of the time she wanted without limit. Lester interrupted Trump often and purposely limited Trump to much less time than he let Hillary have. Do I need to go on? The bias was tangible and extremely Anti-Trump from the very start.
No comments:
Post a Comment