Department of 'Just Us'

 

 

I find it to be difficult to understand the thinking processes of the leaders in the Democratic Party, so I decided to put down a few examples depicting their actions and I then try to determine their underlying thinking processes or motives. In this effort I may draw some conclusions about democrats in general, but I am sure that trying to lump all of them together is most likely inaccurate.

To begin with, I have done quite a bit of analysis and reading about the Clinton Foundation. There have been many people with strong backgrounds in criminal investigation who have said that it is a really good example to use if you want to set up a money-laundering scheme. They take in donations from many political sources including many foreign countries who obviously would have the desire to use the political connections of the Clintons. Now if I talk to a staunch democrat, I will be told that there is nothing wrong with the Clintons receiving donations from foreign countries and foreign companies who want to get special help from the Clintons. As the democrats tell me, the Clintons are much too honest to use this setup as a means of receiving bribes for political favors. However, I am dead certain that if any republican were to be known to receive millions of dollars from people who would clearly want political favors, these same democrats would scream ‘bribes’ at the top of their lungs. So it seems that the only logical conclusion is that in the democrats’ eyes it is OK for democrats to receive suspicious ‘gifts’ that ‘look like bribes’. They also seem to be saying that it is even better than OK for the Clintons to receive anything regardless of appearances.

I think that laid the groundwork for the next ‘short subject’, the Uranium One scandal. It is completely true that during the Obama reign at the same time that Hillary was the head of the State Department, 20% of America’s uranium resources were sold to the Russians. My first question is this. What kind of an idiot would ever think it was a good idea to sell one of America’s chief adversaries our uranium? Now there were supposedly multiple committees who looked at this deal and had to give their approval of the sale. Since this occurred during Obama’s reign, you can be sure that either all of the committee members or almost all of them were Obama appointees. All of them approved of the sale. However, the head of the state department was solely responsible for the ultimate decision. In other words, it the Russians had Hillary’s approval, the deal would be concluded. Interestingly, at or nearly at the same time that the deal was approved, the Russians donated over 140 million dollars to the Clinton foundation. Now we are back to what I said in the previous paragraph. According to the democrats, there is nothing wrong with the Clintons being paid over 140 million dollars at the same time that Hillary is ‘smoothing the way’ for a Russian takeover of 20% of American Uranium. But wait. It gets even better.

The Uranium One deal did not happen overnight. It took years to set up the deal. During those years, the FBI was actively investigating the actions of the Russians involved in the deal. The FBI was absolutely certain that the Russians involved were using bribes, extortion, and many other criminal activities to further the culmination of the Uranium One deal. Now Eric Holder was the attorney general at that time, and he sat in on the Uranium One meetings. In addition, he either knew about the FBI investigation or he should have known about it in his role as attorney general. The FBI covered up the information regarding the investigation of the illegal Russian activities. So now you have a situation where a sale of American uranium that should have never ever been considered is known to be involving multiple criminal actions, and this is kept secret from the very people who should be informed, the members of the various committees approving the sale. But wait it gets even better.

The top FBI men who appear to have been involved in this cover up include two familiar names, Rosenstein and Mueller. We may come back to this later in a post in the future. Suffice to say that these are the same names which are now deeply involved in the ongoing witch hunt about ‘Russian collusion’. Since they may have been involved in the cover up of ‘Russian collusion’ before, I guess the democrats think that they should have the honor of looking for imaginary ‘Russian collusion’ now! But back to the main story line.

So now it appears that we have the democratic president, Obama, who certainly should have known about the proposed sale of American uranium and the related criminal activity and the ongoing cover up. You have the head of the State Department, Hillary Clinton (democrat), who appears to have received over 140 million dollars in bribes by the Russians involved. You have Eric Holder, Rosenstein, and Mueller who may have been involved in the cover up. Can it get any better? Oh yes it can. Did I mention the agent who was deeply involved in the FBI investigation who was forced to sign a non-disclosure agreement about the whole affair? Guess who forced him to sign the non-disclosure agreement, the DOJ (read that as department of just us). Who were they preventing from hearing his testimony with this non-disclosure agreement? Only the United States senators and congressmen!!! Now why would the head of the DOJ make a person sign a non-disclosure agreement which had the single purpose of preventing the truth from ever emerging regarding the criminal activities related to the sale of 20% of America’s uranium to an unfriendly government? Who in the plethora of high-level democrats involved in the Uranium One deal have secrets they want kept hidden?