democrats vs blacks

I would really like to get some comments on this post. I find it difficult to understand how the democrats have convinced anyone that they are fighting for Black rights. There is nothing in the democrat’s history which really supports such a contention. Let’s start near the beginning of American history. You know and I know that there was one group of people in the United States that owned slaves from the beginning of American history. Yes, you guessed it! It was the democrats! Now how can anyone claim that slave owners were interested in the rights of their slaves? Slaves were almost exclusively Blacks. So that sets the stage. From the very beginning, democrats had no interest in Black rights!

Who was the president who fought to give slaves their freedom? You guessed it, Abraham Lincoln, a republican president. But did the democrats accept President Lincoln’s stand. Of course, not! The democrats were not going to give up their slaves without a bloody civil war. So, the democrats caused the civil war by fighting against black rights.

We all know how the civil war ended, but the democrats were still adamantly opposing black rights. You are aware of the “Jim Crow Laws” that the democrats instituted once they had lost the civil war. The whole purpose of the “Jim Crow” laws was to deny blacks their rights by devious and dishonest laws that prevented blacks from exercising their rights. The battle over “Jim Crow” went on for many years, but eventually the “Jim Crow” laws were destroyed.

Do you think that settled the issue of black rights? Of course not. The democrats then found sneaky ways to institute “separatism” which was a means of denying blacks access to public facilities. The democrats also devised intricate rules to deny blacks their voting rights with absurd “reading tests”. Eventually, most of these ploys by the democrats were also defeated.

Then the democrats hit upon a very devious plan to ensure that the blacks would have maximum difficulty in obtaining economic equality. They devised an elaborate “welfare” system where they could pretend that they were assisting “the poor” (read that as mostly blacks). Of course, there is a system of devious rules that are part of the “welfare aid” which is intended to discourage anyone on “welfare” from doing anything to “exit” from welfare. So effectively, the system is set up to offer a minimal subsistence existence just so long as the welfare recipient does nothing outside of the “guidelines”. Effectively, the government can dictate where a welfare recipient can live (is this segregation?), and how much money the recipient can earn. Combine this with the democrat’s demand that no one should be able to send their kids to a school of their own choice when the education being provided by the government is inferior.

So how does this all work together? The democrats tell the “minorities” that they can’t succeed because of “discrimination”. But in reality, if a black is rejected for a job, the most probable reason for the rejection is because the government-provided education was probably inferior, preventing the job applicant from having the skills needed for the job.

So now the democrats have hit on a “solution” whereby they can promote the illusion that they support black rights, thereby winning the majority of black votes. First of all, the democrats have worked to set up an education system where superior private education is mostly denied to the black population. Then they have promoted the widespread fantasy that blacks will be denied employment because of racism. This fantasy also helps to support the other half of the democrat’s strategy. They promote the idea that poor blacks should therefore accept the near poverty existence of welfare because they will be denied jobs based on racism. Then they can claim that they are the “white knights” fighting for blacks, but haven’t you noticed that most of the areas suffering from chronic poverty and lack of opportunity are those areas being run by democrats?