I want to address the situation of ‘spying’ on President
Trump and/or his campaign staff by the ‘Obama administration”. We do know that
there was one application for ‘surveillance’ which was denied, and that there
was one ‘FISA’ warrant granted. So, in my opinion there was an effort to obtain
a warrant which ‘overstepped’ what a judge thought allowable, and then there
was actual surveillance granted. I have not heard anyone address the real
question. Was Trump, or Trump’s organization, or Trump’s colleagues, identified
specifically in the warrant which was granted? Even more interesting to me is
the question, “What was the reason that the first warrant requested was denied?”
In other words, was there an effort made to establish surveillance of Trump or
his associates during the presidential campaign? In my opinion, there is a real
possibility that the Obama administration really did try to set up a
surveillance which would have been the type of action that a police state would
do.
Secondly, in my opinion, there has been a total refusal to
look at the elephant in the room. All of the ‘liberal’ media comments have noted
that the ‘intelligence sources’ have been stating that there is no evidence
that there was a surveillance effort against Trump during the presidential
campaign. I want to ask the obvious question. Are these ‘intelligence sources’
holdovers from the Obama administration? In my opinion, almost every ‘Obama
scandal’ was riddled with ‘lies from Obama administration officials’. They either lied or stonewalled or delayed
every investigation until the ‘scandal’ passed. So, I am asking the obvious
question. If the so-called intelligence sources are holdovers from the Obama
administration, and they may have even be complicit in the ‘surveillance’
effort, why should I have any faith in what they tell me?
No comments:
Post a Comment