Mueller investigation : A crime in progress

Within the American justice system there is a concept of equal protection under the law. Within this concept is the premise that all individuals are to be free from unwarranted government persecution. This protection is an absolute necessity to prevent governmental agencies disguised as law enforcement from being used as weapons against political opponents. In Nazi Germany, the Gestapo was an agency that was very thinly disguised as “law enforcement” which had the actual function of curtailing and destroying anyone or any organization which the government had identified as “undesirable”. The classic process of persecution employed by the Gestapo was to pursue “investigations” of an individual or an organization. It is important to recognize that the investigations were instigated against an individual with the goal being to find an alleged crime to charge the individual with. The investigations were open-ended, they were directed at a specific individual or class of individuals instead of a specific crime, and they had no identifiable criteria which defined a completed investigation. In other words, there was no way to terminate an investigation because there was no specific crime identified, and there was no limit to what or who could be identified as areas of interest. In addition, the concept of equal protection also includes the concept that an investigation may only be instigated when there is a reasonable possibility that a crime has been committed. Attorney General guidelines specify that the FBI supervisor authorizing an investigation shall ensure that the facts which were used to initiate the investigation do provide reasonable possibility, and that they are recorded in writing.

It is my contention that the “Russian collusion investigation” was initiated without any reasonable indication that a crime had been committed. The “Steele dossier” is the only source of any accusation of “Russian collusion”, and it has been discredited based on untruthful accusations and also because the dossier was strictly a political document which had not been validated. If it was used to assert that a crime may have been committed, then it should have been validated before the “Russian collusion investigation” was initiated. Instead it has been debunked. Therefore, the instigation of the investigation was unlawful, and should be terminated because it is a tainted investigation.

It is my further contention, that the investigation was defined as an open-ended investigation of President Trump at the very beginning. It is very obvious that the investigation is not and never was about a specific crime by simply observing the ongoing history that has transpired so far. Initially, there was the alleged collusion between the Trump administration and the Russians during the presidential campaign. Since there has been zero evidence uncovered to support that allegation, the Mueller team has tried to create a possible obstruction of justice crime. Since that has not materialized, they have moved on to allegations regarding a porn star which occurred many years before the presidential campaign. Their latest attempt is to contrive an interview with President Trump for the sole purpose of manipulating President Trump into saying something that they can claim is perjury.  So, they have changed the ‘crime’ multiple times so far which proves that the investigation is simply a personal vendetta against President Trump.

Combine this with the other aspect of the investigation which is being repeated over and over as follows. Identify a person who has been associated with Trump in the past, then either identify a “crime” the person can be alleged to have committed, or manufacture a crime (such as perjury), then destroy that person’s life in an effort to force the person to provide “testimony” against Trump. The tactics being employed in this extortion for testimony are comparable to the thug tactics employed by Nazi Gestapo to railroad people into prison camps. None of tactics being employed by the Mueller investigation are acceptable. President Trump’s civil rights are being trampled by a governmental collection of thugs in an attempt to create a coup of a sitting president for purely political purposes.

The initiation of this investigation was unlawful because there was no evidence of a probable crime to investigate. Instead, it was initiated by a democrat-dominated administration for the sole political purpose of harming a Republican opponent. The investigation is obviously directed at the person, President Trump with the purpose of harming the president, instead of a crime. The official objectives are purposely vague to ensure that the investigation can never be deemed to be complete. The investigators are so grossly prejudiced against the president, that it is ludicrous to pretend that they can objectively perform the job. The personal history of the investigators shows a lack of professional integrity evidenced by Weissman’s history of tainted investigations where he purposely ignored legal rights of defendants. The FBI should be forced to provide the written documentation of the facts used to initiate the investigation, and prove that there was reasonable cause to even initiate the investigation.