selective memory syndrome

The Democrat leadership and the Mueller investigation both suffer from SMS (selective memory syndrome). In this ‘liberal’ disease, the affected party forgets the exact causation of an event and transforms the cause of the event into an indictment of President Trump. For instance, a noteworthy example is the way that James Comey was fired. It is a statement of fact that the dems were outraged with Comey regarding the way that he handled reporting about the Clinton email investigation. If Hillary had been elected, it was a certainty that she would have fired Comey with the wholehearted blessings of the democratic leadership. It is my opinion that the upcoming IG report regarding the Hillary email investigation will indicate that Comey’s conduct was totally unacceptable and that there were multiple instances that warranted his being fired. However, the glaring fact is that Rosenstein wrote a scathing letter recommending that Comey should be fired based on his actions in the Hillary investigation, and President Trump acted on that recommendation. The person that was responsible for Comey’s firing was obviously Rosenstein. However, the ‘liberal hate-trump’ media has fostered the fantasy that Comey was fired by President Trump to obstruct an investigation.

Another example of SMS is the ‘liberal’ media’s talking “tale” regarding McCabe. McCabe was fired by Mr Wray based on overwhelming evidence that McCabe lied multiple times under oath. This evidence was the result of an IG investigation. President Trump was not involved with this process. However, the ‘liberal’ media insists on claiming that President Trump fired McCabe. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Another example of SMS is the various demotions and resignations under duress of other FBI personnel. Instead of acknowledging the fact that all of the firings and demotions in the FBI are an indication of serious misconduct by upper-level FBI individuals, the ‘liberal’ media pushes the fantasy that all is well within the FBI and all of the demotions, etc are the result of ‘paranoid’ Trump claims. The demotions are real and were the result of real corruption in the FBI. Related to this ongoing fantasy is the current fantasy that the definition of an “Undercover informant” is different than a spy. If you have someone working incognito to find out information, then that person is a spy. Now the ‘liberals’ are pushing the idiotic fantasy that the spy (or spies) who slithered into the Trump presidential campaign were only spying on Russian activity, and they have even made the absurd claim that Trump should be grateful that our ever-vigilant FBI was “protecting” him from the Russians. Hogwash!!! If there was a suspected Russian plan to “infiltrate” the Trump campaign, the FBI should have and would have informed Trump of the possibility and “obtained his approval and assistance”. Instead, they hid their activity from him because his campaign was their area of interest, and it is obvious that they were spying on his campaign.

The current information that is evolving is indicative that the whole “spying” activity, and the whole “Russian collusion hoax” was either initiated by the highest area of the Obama administration or welcomed and assisted by the Obama administration. It is a gross misuse of power for a current administration to use government resources to spy against their political opponents. This is the kind of corrupt use of government resources one sees in tyrannical dictatorships and banana republics (just exactly the kind of activity that I would expect of Obama).