The
following is part of the legal definition of extortion.
Virtually all extortion statutes
require that a threat must be made to the person or property of the victim. Threats
to harm the victim's friends or relatives may also be included. It is not necessary
for a threat to involve physical injury. It may be sufficient to threaten to accuse
another person of a crime or to expose a secret that would result in public embarrassment
or ridicule. The threat does not have to relate to an unlawful act. Extortion may
be carried out by a threat to tell the victim's spouse that the victim is having
an illicit sexual affair with another.
Other types of threats sufficient
to constitute extortion include those to harm the victim's business, and many statutes
also provide that any threat to harm another person in his or her career or reputation
is extortion.
Please
reread the definition of extortion above before continuing.
Stormy
Daniels and her lowlife lawyer threatened to make it known that Trump had been
involved with Stormy in some kind of
sexual affair for the express purpose of extorting money from him in the form
of “hush money”. Clearly, Trump was the victim of an extortion scheme by Stormy
Daniels and her lawyer. The extortion demand was paid by Trump’s lawyer, who
was reimbursed by Trump from his own money. To clarify this, the extortion
payment was paid by money which ultimately came from Trump’s personal wealth.
Trump committed no crime. His lawyer committed no crime. Stormy Daniels and her
lawyer committed an act of extortion. According to the democrats, Stormy
Daniels past as a prostitute and her extortion activities make her a hero to be
applauded, and Trump (the victim of the extortion) should be punished. Does any
of this make any sense at all?
Now
they are trying to claim that Trump cannot spend his own money during his
presidential campaign to further his own campaign’s success! They are claiming
that in addition to being a victim of extortion (which the democrats are
applauding), the extortion payment must be considered a campaign expense
(really??!!), and in addition they are claiming that Trump cannot spend his own
money for “campaign expenses! Have you ever heard such a crock before?
No comments:
Post a Comment