I find myself intrigued by the idea of defining what one must
do and think in today’s society to qualify as a proper left-wing democrat.
Since I have not seen anyone else stepping up to the challenge, I will try to
provide some insight on the subject.
First of all, as Deputy Democratic National Committee Chair
Representative Keith Ellison said in April 2017, all democrats must support a
woman’s right to an abortion. He did not suggest that a democrat should support
this right, he demanded that all democrats must support this right. I have
heard all of the rhetoric to support women’s rights attached to abortion, but
there is one undeniable fact. Before the abortion, there is a living human
being in the mother’s womb, and after the abortion, the baby is dead. The death
is not accidental, it is a planned execution, which fits the legal definition
of first-degree murder. A person who claims to be a Christian most certainly
knows that the sixth commandment states “Thou shall not murder.” If support of
committing abortion is required to be a democrat, then how can any Christian be
a democrat? In addition, our founding fathers stated that everyone has the
God-given right to Life, Liberty and pursuit of happiness. Denying an unborn
child the right to life is a violation of this concept. So, it follows that to
be a democrat one must also oppose the rights that our founding fathers fought
and died for.
The second requirement to be a qualified democrat is to
oppose the enforcement of law in America. Contained within this is also the
requirement to oppose the law enforcement officers. There are multiple examples
which I can use to demonstrate the truthfulness of this requirement. The sheer
volume of examples prevents me from elaborating on all of them, but I will
address a few. Do you remember the chant “What do you want? Dead Cops! When do
you want it? Now!” The chant was initiated by Black Lives Matter. What was the
reaction of the democrat leaders? They fell all over themselves trying to outdo
one another in their approval of Black Lives Matter. President Obama even went
out of his way to extend a special invitation to meet with them in the White
House to applaud them. Surely you have heard that N.Y. Governor Cuomo referred
to the law enforcement officers in ICE as thugs, and other democratic leaders
are calling for punishment for ICE officers. The crime committed by the ICE
officers – enforcing the law. Sanctuary cities are simply defiance of federal
law by anarchists disguised as democratic leaders. The conclusion is obvious
and simply stated is “Democrats leaders have no respect for law”. You as a
democrat must also have no respect of law and order. It almost becomes possible
to further conclude that a good democrat must hate law enforcement officers,
but that may not be an absolute requirement.
The third requirement to be a good democrat is to view
everyone within the framework of “identity politics”. It is not permissible to
think of anyone as a unique individual. Instead, the person must be classified
totally by the “identity” assigned to the person by the currently approved
“group think” dogma. For instance, if the person is black, then by group-think
dogma, he/she must be treated as and convinced that he/she is a “victim”, and as
a victim the person is unable to fend for himself/herself, but instead must be
convinced that only the democrats can provide for him/her. I am sure that you
noticed my effort to be gender/neutral which is the currently “PC acceptable”
group-speak permitted. I am sure that you have heard all of the names attached
to “Conservatives” by the “Liberal Left”. The list of names are all based on
“identity politics”, and they are repetitive and boring, and rarely have any
resemblance to reality, but they do serve the democrat’s purposes to engender
unreasoning hatred, suspicion and fear. If you are unable to distill a person
down into a list of adjectives based on group-think “identity politics”, then
you will certainly have difficulty fulfilling your role as a qualified
democrat.
The next requirement is that you must develop a God-complex
to function as a proper left-wing democrat. I am sure that I need to clarify
what I mean by “God-Complex”. Simply stated, you must be totally convinced that
only you have the “true enlightenment” in every aspect of life. If someone
disagrees with you or even questions your beliefs, then not only are they
wrong, but they are defined as the devil incarnate. Since they are the devil
incarnate, then you are justified to do anything to punish them for their “evil
thoughts” or to stop them in their “evil intents”. The logical conclusion to
this line of thought is that only you have the right to free speech, and anyone
who holds beliefs different from yours must be prevented from exercising any
free speech rights. The right to free speech belongs exclusively to only you
and your fellow “Group-Thinkers”! This God-complex is demonstrated perfectly by
Maxine Watters. She carries the idea to its ultimate extreme conclusion. In her
mind, it is epitomized by President Trump who she has defined as “evil” and
herself, who she has associated with “perfect”. She has openly declared her
intent as follows: “I can assemble a bigger and more vicious gang of thugs than
Trump can, and I will organize public assaults upon anyone who supports Trump.
The person who can be more violent and lawless will win because ‘might makes
right’, and I will be more violent and lawless”
There are several more “requirements”, but in order to keep
this article from getting too long, I will only mention one more requirement. It
is that you must become totally committed to complying with the dictated
group-think that is the current norm for any idea, group of people, etc being
endorsed by the democrat leaders at any time. Further, you must be flexible
enough to totally reverse your mindset if the current group-think requires it.
As an example, group think states that providing economic assistance for blacks
is a good thing. However, group think requires that you ignore the fact that
black unemployment is at the lowest level in history, because group-think also states
that you must hate everything related to President Trump. It can be difficult
because the basic premise of group-think is that you (the average democrat)
cannot and must not think for yourself. If a “leader” demeans someone, you must
be in total agreement with the “leader”
If you think you can comply with all of these “requirements”,
then you may be able to qualify as a democrat. But who knows, group-think may
change tomorrow and all of the qualification requirements may change.
No comments:
Post a Comment