Article by Pat Buchanan

Click the link to read the article.

Kavanaugh Lynching Prelude to Trump Impeachment

Your hatred and bias is showing

_{I would like to respond to the obviously biased and carefully demeaning Ny Times article written by Mr. Adam Uptak designed to impart a totally misleading interpretation of the most recent chapter of the medieval inquisition (read that as lynching) of Mr. Brett Kavanaugh. Before any of the democratic senators even spoke to Mr. Kavenaugh, they clearly expressed their hatred for him and all conservative judges by declaring that they would never confirm him as a Supreme Court justice. There has been zero attempt by the democratic senators in the hearing to ascertain if Mr. Kavenaugh has the qualifications to be a Supreme Court justice. Instead, the entire hearing has been used by the democratic senators to demean or attack Mr. Kavenaugh. They even participated in the employment of paid agitators to disrupt the earliest hearings. In short the democratic senators hands are filthy with hatred and hypocrisy displayed by total disrespect for Mr. Kavenaugh during the whole confirmation process, which they have turned into a sham. I am convinced that the democratic senators have also been trolling for anyone willing to accuse Mr. Kavenaugh of sexual misconduct because THAT IS WHAT THE DEMOCRATS DO!}

_{Mr Adam Uptak took great pleasure in demeaning Brett Kavenaugh for stating the truth regarding what is being done to him. I am surprised that Mr. Adam Uptak and his cohorts did not find some way to imply that Brett Kavenaugh was known to wear diapers when he was six months old and that surely should disqualify him for the position of Supreme Court justice. If Mr Adam Uptak were subjected to a fraction of the hatred, or a fraction of the slander that Brett Kavenaugh has been subjected to I am sure that the only words coming out of his mouth would be four-letter expletives, and I am sure that there are plenty of "instances" in Mr Adam Uptak's juvenile days that he could be persecuted for. As I read his article, I could smell the stink of his self-righteousness and smugness as he attempted to put the final touches on the slanderous character assassination of Mr. Kavenaugh.}

_{Watching the progress of the dedicated character assassination of a man who has probably lived an exemplary life is disgusting, especially when one realizes that one of the principal reasons that he is being destroyed is because he supports the right to life of an unborn child.}

Used, abused, and discarded

I have to confess that on first hearing about Christine Blasey Ford’s allegation against Brett Kavenaugh, the lack of details, and the 36 year age of the accusation, my initial reaction was to lump Christine in with the hate-mongering democratic leaders as a co-conspirator in an orchestrated smear campaign. However, after listening to the entire senate hearing today, I have modified my belief.

I believe that Christine Ford is a very troubled woman who appears to have experienced something traumatic. I believe that the democratic leaders have used her as an expendable pawn in their ongoing hate-campaign. All of the democrats who were aware of Christine’s letter plotted to release it at the most politically advantageous time, just before the planned confirmation vote. They did not care about Christine’s desires at all. They used her as a tool of destruction, and if she got hurt in the process, well that is just collateral damage. As an aside, they flat did not give a damn what happened to Brett Kavenaugh and his family, or the destruction of their constitutional duty to affirm that a Supreme Court nominee is competent. Constitutional duty be damned, death and destruction to anyone whose ideas are not in step with democratic group-think. The only thing which is important to the democratic leadership is power, power, and more power.

In the process of their smear-and-destroy campaign, they have demonstrated a total lack of ethics, zero respect for law and order, a willingness to destroy anyone or anything that blocks their quest for power, and zero empathy for the feelings and needs of anyone that they cannot manipulate.

give Trump credit

Click on the link to read the article:

Ken Langone: Give Trump Credit for 'Booming Economy'

 

The push toward anarchy

The late U.S. Supreme Court Justice Tom Clark once wrote, “This nation was dedicated to freedom under law, not under mobs.” His comment is very appropriate to the current standard of conduct being encouraged by the left-wing democratic leadership. You have Maxine Watters telling her followers to assault conservative leaders in public. You have the left-wing liberal media claiming that the violence of the antifa organization is somehow justified. What kind of fantasy world do they live in where one group of people are “permitted” to attack someone because they have a different opinion. The left-wing hate groups are trying to institute lawlessness and anarchy into America to destroy the right to free speech and freedom for anyone who disagrees with them. This is the attitude typical of every dictatorship that has ever existed. Public assault of people is not free speech. It is a criminal act, and it should be treated as such.

The conservatives being publically assaulted should exercise their right to equal justice and protection under the law. Those who are publically assaulting them should be arrested and charged with felony assault. If the police refuse to provide the lawful enforcement of their right to protection from assault, then the leaders of the police department should be charged with every possible charge available to force them to enforce the law. This is not a third-world country with a caste system where one set of people can be persecuted legally with no legal recourse.

If this does not stop the public assaults, then perhaps it might be necessary to resort to an old saying, “What is good for the goose is good for the gander.” To be explicit, if the democrats can break the law, and established law enforcement agencies do nothing, then it may be time for the conservatives to organize a campaign of public harassment of every liberal politician every time they go to church, to dinner, to a movie, or anywhere else they can be cornered. Maybe a very real dose of liberal-like hate-mongering may open the liberals’ eyes.

Treason must not be tolerated

Treason:  the crime of betraying one's country, especially by attempting to kill the sovereign or overthrow the government.

 

I began this article by stating the definition of treason for good reason. The Democratic leaders have now drafted a letter to the heads of the FBI, the DOJ and several other agencies demanding that they disobey the direct orders of the lawfully-elected and legal President of the United States. This is nothing short of an attempt to overthrow the head of our executive branch of government. The act of overthrowing a president is defined as illegally removing him from power by a coup. Clearly, this action by the democratic leaders is an attempt of a coup of a sitting president.

The federal penalty for treason is spelled out in U.S. Code title 18 to be either:

a.     Death or

b.     Not less than 5 years imprisonment or more than life imprisonment without the possibility of parole and minimum fine of $10,000 if not sentenced to death, and loss of the right to ever run for or hold public office.

This is a clear statement of my analysis of the current situation. Do you agree? If so, write to the DOJ, write to your senator, write to your congressman and last of all write to the president expressing your support for him. This is America, not a third-world country. Mob rule must not be permitted in America!

character assassination

I feel compelled to address the ongoing attempted character assassination of the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. First of all, the alledged incident is supposed to have occurred more than 35 years ago. What we have here is an incident which was never mentioned by the alleged victim for more than 30 years. However, as a last-ditch effort to derail Mr. Kavanaugh’s appointment as a Supreme Court justice, the alleged victim, Christine Blasey Ford suddenly decides that she must make the accusation public. The timing of the accusation is planned to have the maximum negative effect on Mr. Kavanaugh’s appointment. To illuminate this, it is necessary to note that the accusation in not made until after all of the senate confirmation process is completed, just a couple of days before the planned confirmation vote. This is intentional so that the scheduled vote will be delayed. However, the alleged victim purposely misleads the senate leaders to believe that she will testify if a special senate hearing is scheduled. Once she knows that the senate has scheduled the special hearing, she immediately acts to scuttle the hearing by adding requirements that the senate “must comply with” before she will grace them with her presence. In doing so, she has managed to scuttle the confirmation vote, delay any further action until the “special hearing”, and then, if she is successful in scuttling the special hearing, the new requirement will take weeks to comply with. What is the purpose of all of this delaying tactic? It is obviously intended to ensure that Mr. Kavanaugh’s appointment will not occur before the Supreme Court reconvenes on Oct 1^st. Why would an alleged victim never make an accusation for more than 30 years and then plan the public accusation for purely political purposes?

Now to some of the “facts” of the allegation. When asked when the incident allegedly occurred, the “victim” can’t identify the time of year or even what year it occurred. When asked where the incident occurred, the “victim” can’t recall where the incident occurred. If I experienced anything similar to what she claims happened, you can be sure that I would know when and where it happened.  As a matter of fact, she can’t remember anything about the incident that can be used to confirm that it actually happened. However, after more than 35 years, the “victim” with the foggy memory demands that we accept her statement that she still remembers his name. However, the only other person who she claims was a witness to the incident states that “It never happened”. Given the extensive amount of time that the “victim” remained silent, the timeliness of the accusation, the sparseness of confirming details, and the denials of both the “accused” and the “witness”, her accusation is not believable.

In addition, her new “requirement” that she not be required to testify in a senate hearing until the FBI investigates her accusation is ludicrous. Her intention is plainly obvious to simply delay the confirmation vote until at least after the Oct 1^st convening of the Supreme Court. In my opinion, it is her hope and the hope of her democratic compadres that the FBI investigation can be extended for years in the same manner that the Meuller special council is a never-ending, open-ended investigation of a person in search of an imaginary crime.

In conclusion, her actions are not the actions I would expect from a victim. However, this whole scenario of last minute character assassination, followed by a dedicated trial of the accused by the liberal media, pronouncement of guilt by the liberal media, and attacking anyone who expresses a different opinion than the liberal media is a classic example of how the left-wing radicals and their liberal media cohorts collude to destroy the accused person.

Comment on D. Feinstein

Click the link below to read the article:

Judicial Crisis Network: Democrats Doubling Down on Kavanaugh ‘Character Assassination’

filth from Diane Feinstein

What can you say about Diane Feinstein? I know that she has made some outlandish statements in the past. I know that she has held her position for way too long. I guess that you can now add that she has demonstrated no regard for decency in her latest attempt to sully the reputation of the nominee for the Supreme Court position. In case you are not aware of the details of her preposterous attempt, here is the nutshell description. She claims to have a letter from an anonymous source that accuses Kavanaugh of sexual misconduct that allegedly occurred more than 35 years ago when he was in high school. She claims that the anonymous source’s name cannot be revealed to protect their reputation. In my opinion, either she or someone she knew fabricated the accusation, and the whole thing is a total lie. It is just another disgusting example of the filthy methods being employed by the “liberal left” in their ongoing hate campaign. I don’t believe that there is a level too low or too disgusting for them to employ because they have no shame or ethics.

Another "low" for the democrats

Once again the democratic leadership and their senseless followers have taken the lowest road possible in their hateful “resistance” to anything related to Trump. The senate hearing regarding the Supreme Court nominee should be a respectfully orchestrated process to permit the members of the committee to ascertain if the nominee is qualified for the appointment. It should not be a slash-and-burn campaign of destruction. The democratic senators were shamefully attempting to entrap, tarnish or otherwise demean the nominee. It was a mockery of a real hearing and an attempt by the democratic leaders to turn the entire proceeding into a travesty. They should be ashamed of their obvious misuse of what should be a dignified and honorable proceeding. In addition, their acceptance of and participation in the ongoing attempts to disrupt the proceeding by idiotic self-serving outbursts from paid agitators simply underscores their contempt for law and order. Anyone with an ounce of intelligence can plainly see that the democratic leaders were participating in a program based on self-centered hatred predicated on “win at any cost”. If I were a democrat, I would have been mortified to see “my representatives” conduct themselves in such a reprehensible manner.

Obama would have needed more than a "magic wand"

Click on the link below to read the article:

Trump Claps Back at Obama With 'Magic Wand' Tweet

The "Dems" don't care if it is illegal

click on the link below to read the article:

Sen. Collins ‘Bribed’ to Vote Against Kavanaugh With $1.3 Million Threat

Real facts about the "Trump" economy

Click on the links below to read the articles:

Stephen Moore: Trump Deserves Nobel Prize for Economics

WashPost: Blue-Collar Job Growth at 30-Year High

search for truth

The DOJ and the FBI have been stonewalling congressional requests for documents for months and months. The few documents which have been provided have been so heavily redacted as to be almost useless in the ongoing effort by the DOJ and FBI to cover up their corrupt actions. The claim being used by them in their refusal to comply has been that there are "security" reasons preventing their compliance with congressional requests. Thank God that President Trump is finally going to help congress to see those documents.

Click on the link below to read about this.

Trump Expected to Declassify Carter Page, Bruce Ohr DOJ Docs

Requiem for a tyrant

Today, Obama sullied a noble tradition of all previous presidents to demonstrate a respect for their successors. Even if a previous president did not agree with the current president’s policies, he still spoke with respect for the current president. Instead, today Obama spewed nothing but hatred for the current president. Repeatedly, Obama tried to take credit for the successes of the Trump administration. In doing this, he consistently lied and lied and lied. Facts are facts. The failures of the Obama administration have been repeatedly revealed. The economy during Obama’s administration SUCKED! He was the only president to never have economic growth greater than 3% for any year. The stifling business-killing regulations of his administration were a major contribution to the dismal economy. The entire eight years of Obama’s administration was an abysmal failure riddled with corruption. It is disgusting to see an abject failure such as Obama try to take credit for President Trump’s success.

Good News for Trump supporters

Are you getting tired of all the constant lies being circulated about President Trump? Are you also getting tired of the constant harassment of Trump supporters and officials in his administration? Are you getting tired of the constant twisting of the facts and the bogus wrong-headed statements by the fake news liberal propaganda? Are you sick and tired of the far-left leaders of high tech attempting to destroy your right to speak your opinion? There are some conservatives working to combat the attempts of the far-left to dictate group-think. Click on the link below to check out an effort to provide the "real" facts and a "real" effort to combat the far-left propaganda.

Check out conservative viewpoint

Mueller and Weissman: their history

 Click on the link below to read the article.

Support Grows for Trump to Pardon John Kiriakou

More good news: another atta boy for Trump

The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment aid fell to near a 49-year low last week and private payrolls rose steadily in August, pointing to sustained labor market strength that should continue to underpin economic growth.

The economy so far appears to be weathering an escalating trade war between the United States and China as well as tensions with other trade partners, including Canada, the European Union and Mexico, which have rattled financial markets.

This likely keeps the Federal Reserve on track to raise interest rates this month for the third time this year.

“The economy is in overdrive with jobless claims at lows not seen since the 1960s, and this gives the Fed the green light to raise interest rates later this month and take away some of the economy’s punch,” said Chris Rupkey, chief economist at MUFG in New York.

The Labor Department said on Thursday initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 10,000 to a seasonally adjusted 203,000 for the week ended Sept. 1, the lowest level since December 1969.

atta boy for Trump

An excerpt from a Newsmax article:

 

Median household income reportedly has soared more than 4 percent since President Donald Trump took office amid overall brisk economic growth and robust optimism.

Inflation-adjusted median household incomes in July hit $62,450, Investor’s Business Daily reported, citing the latest release from Sentier Research.

“That's the highest level since Sentier started tracking this more than 18 years ago. And if you combine Sentier's numbers with annual Census data, median household income is at all-time highs,” IBD reported.

“More interesting is the fact that median household income has shot up more than 4% in the 19 months since Trump took office. It had been flat over the previous year and a half. Over the course of President Obama's entire eight years in office, median household income climbed a mere 0.3%, Sentier data show,” IBD reported.

To be sure, U.S. economic growth was a bit stronger than initially thought in the second quarter, notching its best performance in nearly four years, as businesses boosted spending on software and imports declined, Reuters reported.

Gross domestic product increased at a 4.2 percent annualized rate, the Commerce Department said on Wednesday in its second estimate of GDP growth for the April-June quarter. That was slightly up from the 4.1 percent pace of expansion it reported in July and was the fastest rate since the third quarter of 2014.

Businesses spent more on software than previously estimated in the second quarter and the nation also imported less petroleum. Stronger business spending and a smaller import bill offset a small downward revision to consumer spending.

Meanwhile, Americans' consumer confidence rose in August to the highest level in nearly 18 years as their assessment of current conditions improved further and their expectations about the future rebounded, the Associated Press reported.

The Conference Board reported Tuesday that its consumer confidence index rose to 133.4 in August, up from a reading 127.9 in July. It was the highest reading since confidence stood at 135.8 in October 2000.

To become a left-wing democrat

I find myself intrigued by the idea of defining what one must do and think in today’s society to qualify as a proper left-wing democrat. Since I have not seen anyone else stepping up to the challenge, I will try to provide some insight on the subject.

First of all, as Deputy Democratic National Committee Chair Representative Keith Ellison said in April 2017, all democrats must support a woman’s right to an abortion. He did not suggest that a democrat should support this right, he demanded that all democrats must support this right. I have heard all of the rhetoric to support women’s rights attached to abortion, but there is one undeniable fact. Before the abortion, there is a living human being in the mother’s womb, and after the abortion, the baby is dead. The death is not accidental, it is a planned execution, which fits the legal definition of first-degree murder. A person who claims to be a Christian most certainly knows that the sixth commandment states “Thou shall not murder.” If support of committing abortion is required to be a democrat, then how can any Christian be a democrat? In addition, our founding fathers stated that everyone has the God-given right to Life, Liberty and pursuit of happiness. Denying an unborn child the right to life is a violation of this concept. So, it follows that to be a democrat one must also oppose the rights that our founding fathers fought and died for.

The second requirement to be a qualified democrat is to oppose the enforcement of law in America. Contained within this is also the requirement to oppose the law enforcement officers. There are multiple examples which I can use to demonstrate the truthfulness of this requirement. The sheer volume of examples prevents me from elaborating on all of them, but I will address a few. Do you remember the chant “What do you want? Dead Cops! When do you want it? Now!” The chant was initiated by Black Lives Matter. What was the reaction of the democrat leaders? They fell all over themselves trying to outdo one another in their approval of Black Lives Matter. President Obama even went out of his way to extend a special invitation to meet with them in the White House to applaud them. Surely you have heard that N.Y. Governor Cuomo referred to the law enforcement officers in ICE as thugs, and other democratic leaders are calling for punishment for ICE officers. The crime committed by the ICE officers – enforcing the law. Sanctuary cities are simply defiance of federal law by anarchists disguised as democratic leaders. The conclusion is obvious and simply stated is “Democrats leaders have no respect for law”. You as a democrat must also have no respect of law and order. It almost becomes possible to further conclude that a good democrat must hate law enforcement officers, but that may not be an absolute requirement.

The third requirement to be a good democrat is to view everyone within the framework of “identity politics”. It is not permissible to think of anyone as a unique individual. Instead, the person must be classified totally by the “identity” assigned to the person by the currently approved “group think” dogma. For instance, if the person is black, then by group-think dogma, he/she must be treated as and convinced that he/she is a “victim”, and as a victim the person is unable to fend for himself/herself, but instead must be convinced that only the democrats can provide for him/her. I am sure that you noticed my effort to be gender/neutral which is the currently “PC acceptable” group-speak permitted. I am sure that you have heard all of the names attached to “Conservatives” by the “Liberal Left”. The list of names are all based on “identity politics”, and they are repetitive and boring, and rarely have any resemblance to reality, but they do serve the democrat’s purposes to engender unreasoning hatred, suspicion and fear. If you are unable to distill a person down into a list of adjectives based on group-think “identity politics”, then you will certainly have difficulty fulfilling your role as a qualified democrat.

The next requirement is that you must develop a God-complex to function as a proper left-wing democrat. I am sure that I need to clarify what I mean by “God-Complex”. Simply stated, you must be totally convinced that only you have the “true enlightenment” in every aspect of life. If someone disagrees with you or even questions your beliefs, then not only are they wrong, but they are defined as the devil incarnate. Since they are the devil incarnate, then you are justified to do anything to punish them for their “evil thoughts” or to stop them in their “evil intents”. The logical conclusion to this line of thought is that only you have the right to free speech, and anyone who holds beliefs different from yours must be prevented from exercising any free speech rights. The right to free speech belongs exclusively to only you and your fellow “Group-Thinkers”! This God-complex is demonstrated perfectly by Maxine Watters. She carries the idea to its ultimate extreme conclusion. In her mind, it is epitomized by President Trump who she has defined as “evil” and herself, who she has associated with “perfect”. She has openly declared her intent as follows: “I can assemble a bigger and more vicious gang of thugs than Trump can, and I will organize public assaults upon anyone who supports Trump. The person who can be more violent and lawless will win because ‘might makes right’, and I will be more violent and lawless”

There are several more “requirements”, but in order to keep this article from getting too long, I will only mention one more requirement. It is that you must become totally committed to complying with the dictated group-think that is the current norm for any idea, group of people, etc being endorsed by the democrat leaders at any time. Further, you must be flexible enough to totally reverse your mindset if the current group-think requires it. As an example, group think states that providing economic assistance for blacks is a good thing. However, group think requires that you ignore the fact that black unemployment is at the lowest level in history, because group-think also states that you must hate everything related to President Trump. It can be difficult because the basic premise of group-think is that you (the average democrat) cannot and must not think for yourself. If a “leader” demeans someone, you must be in total agreement with the “leader”

If you think you can comply with all of these “requirements”, then you may be able to qualify as a democrat. But who knows, group-think may change tomorrow and all of the qualification requirements may change.