character assassination

I feel compelled to address the ongoing attempted character assassination of the Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. First of all, the alledged incident is supposed to have occurred more than 35 years ago. What we have here is an incident which was never mentioned by the alleged victim for more than 30 years. However, as a last-ditch effort to derail Mr. Kavanaugh’s appointment as a Supreme Court justice, the alleged victim, Christine Blasey Ford suddenly decides that she must make the accusation public. The timing of the accusation is planned to have the maximum negative effect on Mr. Kavanaugh’s appointment. To illuminate this, it is necessary to note that the accusation in not made until after all of the senate confirmation process is completed, just a couple of days before the planned confirmation vote. This is intentional so that the scheduled vote will be delayed. However, the alleged victim purposely misleads the senate leaders to believe that she will testify if a special senate hearing is scheduled. Once she knows that the senate has scheduled the special hearing, she immediately acts to scuttle the hearing by adding requirements that the senate “must comply with” before she will grace them with her presence. In doing so, she has managed to scuttle the confirmation vote, delay any further action until the “special hearing”, and then, if she is successful in scuttling the special hearing, the new requirement will take weeks to comply with. What is the purpose of all of this delaying tactic? It is obviously intended to ensure that Mr. Kavanaugh’s appointment will not occur before the Supreme Court reconvenes on Oct 1^st. Why would an alleged victim never make an accusation for more than 30 years and then plan the public accusation for purely political purposes?

Now to some of the “facts” of the allegation. When asked when the incident allegedly occurred, the “victim” can’t identify the time of year or even what year it occurred. When asked where the incident occurred, the “victim” can’t recall where the incident occurred. If I experienced anything similar to what she claims happened, you can be sure that I would know when and where it happened.  As a matter of fact, she can’t remember anything about the incident that can be used to confirm that it actually happened. However, after more than 35 years, the “victim” with the foggy memory demands that we accept her statement that she still remembers his name. However, the only other person who she claims was a witness to the incident states that “It never happened”. Given the extensive amount of time that the “victim” remained silent, the timeliness of the accusation, the sparseness of confirming details, and the denials of both the “accused” and the “witness”, her accusation is not believable.

In addition, her new “requirement” that she not be required to testify in a senate hearing until the FBI investigates her accusation is ludicrous. Her intention is plainly obvious to simply delay the confirmation vote until at least after the Oct 1^st convening of the Supreme Court. In my opinion, it is her hope and the hope of her democratic compadres that the FBI investigation can be extended for years in the same manner that the Meuller special council is a never-ending, open-ended investigation of a person in search of an imaginary crime.

In conclusion, her actions are not the actions I would expect from a victim. However, this whole scenario of last minute character assassination, followed by a dedicated trial of the accused by the liberal media, pronouncement of guilt by the liberal media, and attacking anyone who expresses a different opinion than the liberal media is a classic example of how the left-wing radicals and their liberal media cohorts collude to destroy the accused person.