A Recap

I know that Hillary and the DNC paid about 12 million dollars to generate a dossier about Donald Trump which has been shown to be nothing but third and fourth-hand hearsay and unfounded accusations. I know that they went to extreme measures in an effort to cover up the fact that they were the source that paid for the dossier. I know that Hillary and the DNC enlisted the help of high-level rogue FBI people to fraudulently use the dossier to obtain fisa warrents to illegally spy on Americans. I know that those same rogue FBI people lied to the FISA court by implying that the dossier was a valid fact-based document. I know that there were extremely excessive numbers of illegal leaks of information by FBI sources. I know that there was a dedicated effort to frame President Trump of a fabricated charge. I know that the special counsel led by Mueller is a purely political witch hunt with only one aim, find something that they can claim President Trump did wrong. I know that Obama used government agencies as political weapons against his political opponents, exactly like any third-world dictator would do. It is a very small baby step to assume that Obama would use the FBI and the DOJ as weapons against his political enemies.

Given what I just listed, and given the known facts regarding the development of the current witch hunt which has gone on for over 18 months with exactly zero evidence of collusion, I would like indulge in some speculation.

The stated purpose for the dossier was that it was the usual political effort to develop dirty accusations against a political opponent. As such, there was little interest in assuring that the allegations were true. The only purpose was to develop dirt which could be thrown. This is basically what the democrats are saying, and they claim that it is the normal process for any campaign. I don’t believe this. It is my opinion that from the very beginning, the democrats intended to initiate an FBI investigation of a fantasy crime. They intended to use the FBI to derail the Trump campaign, and then failing that, the FBI investigation is intended to enable a successful coup against President Trump.

In my opinion, the purpose, the plan, and the execution thereof was a joint effort of the Obama Administration and the Hillary campaign. The dossier was paid for by the DNC, and was written by Christopher Steele, whose hatred for Trump is documented in texts. Mister Steele was willing to go to any lengths to prevent Trump from being elected president. Fusion GPS was one of the intermediary agents used in developing the dossier because, in part, FBI agent Ohr’s wife worked there. It is a gross conflict of interest for the FBI agent who was involved in the faux Hillary email investigation, to work with his wife to develop a politically-motivated sleaze dossier. However, there was an obvious political bias within the FBI leadership to ensure that the Hillary investigations were nothing but shams, and conversely this bias was exploited to make false accusations against President Trump. I can almost guarantee you that if there is a real effort made to learn the truth, Obama himself was a principal player in setting up this ongoing witch hunt by Mueller. It is a gross misuse of power by a sitting president to use government agencies such as the IRS and the FBI to destroy his political opponents. I know that Obama used the IRS in that manner, ala Lois Lerner. I know that the FBI has been used as a political weapon. All of the firings and demotions within the FBI attest to this fact. And it is my conclusion that the current situation is the result of a conspiracy to enable a coup against President Trump. This was not a banana republic before Obama became president.

an article by Steven Moore

By Stephen Moore
Tuesday, 06 Feb 2018 08:44 AM

The unseemly sight of nearly the entire Democratic congressional delegation sitting on their hands and clinging to their chairs throughout Donald Trump's State of the Union speech is further evidence that they want America to fail on Trump's watch.

Hundreds of American companies are bringing jobs to America and paying American workers bonuses: Democrats sat stone-faced. The lowest black unemployment rate in 40 years: Democrats smirked. We are defeating ISIS in the Middle East: Ho-hum.

Many on the left are suffering from a severe case of anti-Trump derangement syndrome. ATDS sufferers crave bad news. In a bright, sunny economic sky, they point to the single cloud.

The other day I was on CNN and was sparring with April Ryan of the American Urban Radio Networks — who is, to say the least, not friendly to Trump. When I mentioned all of the companies that are hiring more workers and paying bonuses or raises to their employees, including as many as 1 million Walmart employees, I thought this might elicit some positive reaction. Instead, she complained that Walmart is closing many of its Sam's Club stores, resulting in employees' being laid off. Yes, the Sam's Club closures impact around 9,000 workers, though many of them have been reassigned to other Walmart stores. Meanwhile, about 100 times that number will get raises and/or bonuses.

Liberals have been protesting Walmart pay scales for years. Now Walmart is raising their minimum wage by $2 an hour, but the left is angrier than ever.

For at least two weeks the TV networks on the left praised Michael Wolff's book "Fire and Fury." They obsessed over the charge of whether Trump was mentally competent to hold office and even called for his ousting under the 25th Amendment — all based purely on unsubstantiated charges in a book that has now been exposed as largely a work of fiction. Many members of the ATDS crowd don't even care whether the information is true or false. They are the "birthers" on the left.

One year in, and Trump's successes are dismissed as a result of Barack Obama's policies — which is rich, since Trump has one-by-one reversed Obama-era policies. If the economy and stock market had tanked in 2017, liberals would have seized upon the bad news as evidence that Trump's policies were abject failures. Now that the policies are working, Obama gets the credit. They are so blinded by ATDS, they can't even acknowledge the double standard.

I remember at a Wall Street Journal editorial meeting when Barack Obama was first elected president and he was rolling out Obamacare, the stimulus plan, tax increases, a regulatory assault and a litany of other dimwitted economic policies, one of the writers said what we were all thinking: If this program works, everything we believe on the economy is wrong.

We opposed the policies, not the man, and in the end the Keynesian big-government policies were indeed a failure. We ended up with our weakest economic recovery since World War II.

It is true that opposition to Obama on the right prompted some conservatives to root against American success on his watch. When the International Olympics Committee snubbed Obama's hometown of Chicago, there were videos of conservatives celebrating the bad news. The cascade of disappointing economic data on Obama's watch was too often cheered by Republicans.

"Some of these (Republicans) are starting to put politics first and country second," observed then-Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., who is now a senator. "The American people are starting to wonder if they are rooting against America," he charged. He had a point back in 2009. But, senator, look in the mirror.

Most Americans are not especially ideological. We are for what works. The United States is on a roll right now, and the good economic news transcends political spin. Tens of millions of Americans are starting to see the benefits in their paychecks. If Trump-haters continue to sit on their hands and oppose America's comeback, voters will see they are putting political ideology over patriotism. That's no winning ticket, and it means they are in for a miserable next seven years.

Stephen Moore is a distinguished visiting fellow at The Heritage Foundation, economics contributor to FreedomWorks and author of "Who's the Fairest of Them All?"

FBI internal affairs?

Dictators, Despots, and third-world banana republics all use law enforcement and other government agencies as weapons to destroy their political opponents. The better countries with democratically organized government tend to use the same agencies more to benefit the overall society. The most alarming fact to be exposed by the Nunes memo which was just unclassified is that it clearly shows that the upper level members of the FBI believe that they should use their power to destroy anyone who does not share their political opinions. Not only that, it also clearly shows that the upper level members of the FBI also believe that they should use their power to protect people who share their political views. Last of all, it also shows that the mindset of the upper FBI has been to bend or even break the law to protect those sharing their political views and conversely attack those with differing political views. This is frightening!

When Hitler, Stalin, Mussolini, and a plethora of other historical dictators came into power, one of the first actions they took was to totally corrupt the law enforcement to use them as weapons. In those cases where there was an existing government body of lawmakers (such as congressmen), the dictators destroyed the lawmakers oversight powers, and they also ensured that the lawmakers were kept ignorant of the actions being undertaken by the weaponized law enforcement. The actions of the FBI leadership as detailed by the Nunes memo shows a carefully choreographed plan to accomplish those exact goals. The FBI leadership used their power to attack individuals of a different political group by fraudulently obtaining fisa warrants to unlawfully spy on U.S. citizens. The FBI leadership stonewalled attempts by congress to lawfully obtain information to exercise their constitutional oversight responsibility. The FBI leadership even made a short-lived effort to lie to congress about the availability of information, claiming it had been lost. So far, FBI agent Orr has been demoted twice. He should be fired and probably even prosecuted for participating in the effort to assemble a fraudulent dossier that included colluding with Russian agents. James Comey was fired for blatantly conducting a sham investigation of Hillary Clinton. He should be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. FBI agent Andrew McCabe has been fired for planning and assisting in the fraudulent fisa warrant activities, and his apparent acceptance of money from Hillary for his wife’s political campaign in return for helping organize the sham investigation of Hillary’s email scandal. Agent Stryzok has been demoted for blatant hatred of President Trump embodied in posts to his lover, participating in the sham Hillary investigation, and apparently conspiring to bring about a coup of our duly elected president, plus other issues. He should be convicted of conspiracy to overthrow our government. The whole Russia/Trump collusion fantasy was constructed by Hillary and Obama in collusion with various Russian agents assisted by these same FBI leaders. So some of the dirty political actors are getting some measure of punishment for their illegal and/or immoral activities.

 But there needs to be more action taken. For one thing, it appears to me that we need an internal affairs unit created within the FBI to ensure that such corruption will not be repeated. The internal affairs should have several distinct functions. First of all, any request from congress for information from the FBI must be complied with IMMEDIATELY. Stonewalling these requests MUST NOT BE TOLERATED.  Therefore, internal affairs should be the point of contact for information requests from congress. To make absolutely sure that information will be available, a redundant document storage and retrieval system must be set up which will create duplicate documentation outside of the possible access of normal FBI agents, but available to internal affairs. Once created, no document in the internal affairs document base can be updated, revisions of originals will be reflected as additional documents with full traceability of changes. Also, no document can be deleted from internal affairs. It can only be archived. To further ensure that documentation integrity is maintained, there should also be a storage of documents with the Inspector General, again accessible by only the IG. Another function which the FBI internal affairs department should perform is a review of all investigations related to any political figure to ensure that a corrupt high-level FBI agent will have difficulty taking actions which are not within normal investigative procedures. The internal affairs department should have the right to initiate internal investigations to identify and prosecute any FBI personnel leaking information to the public media. It also seems to me that internal affairs should have the ability and authorization to convene a grand jury if they deem that criminal actions have occurred within the FBI. I am sure that any congressman dedicated to the concept of eliminating future corruption of the FBI can add other functions and/or modify what I have suggested. No matter what corrective actions are taken, congressional oversight capabilities must be protected.

President Trump

 

_{Liz Crokin is an award-winning author, a seasoned journalist and an advocate for sex crime victims Liz began her journey at the University of Iowa where she received a bachelor's in journalism and political science.}

 

_{Trump Does The Unthinkable by Liz Crokin}

 

 _{As an entertainment journalist, I've had the opportunity to cover Trump for over a decade, and in all my years covering him I've never heard anything negative about the man until he announced he was running for president. Keep in mind, I got paid a lot
of money to dig up dirt on celebrities like Trump for a living so a scandalous story on the famous billionaire could've potentially sold a lot of magazines and would've been a huge feather in my cap.}

 

_{Instead,
I found that he doesn't drink alcohol or do drugs, he's a hardworking businessman.}

_{On
top of that, he's one of the most generous celebrities in the world with a heart filled with more gold than his $100 million New York penthouse.}

 

_{Since the media has failed so miserably at reporting the truth about Trump, I decided to put together some of the acts of
kindness he's committed over three decades which has gone virtually unnoticed or fallen on deaf ears.}

 

_{•
In 1986, Trump prevented the foreclosure of Annabell Hill's family farm after her husband committed suicide.  Trump personally phoned down to the auction to stop the sale of her home and offered the widow money.  Trump decided to take action after he saw Hill's
pleas for help in news reports.}

 

_{•
In 1988, a commercial airline refused to fly Andrew Ten, a sick Orthodox Jewish child with a rare illness, across the country to get medical care because he had to travel with an elaborate life-support system. His grief stricken parents contacted Trump for
help and he didn't hesitate to send his own plane to take the child from Los Angeles to New York so he could get his treatment.}

 

 _{•
In 1991, 200 Marines who served in Operation Desert Storm spent time at Camp Lejune in North Carolina before they were scheduled to return home to their families. However, the Marines were told that a mistakehad been made and an aircraft would not be able to take them home on their scheduled departure date.  When Trump got wind of this, he sent his plane to make two trips from North Carolina to Miami to safelyreturn the Gulf War Marines to their loved ones.}

 

_{•
In 1995, a motorist stopped to help Trump after the limo he was traveling in got a flat tire.  Trump asked the Good Samaritan how he could repay him for his help. All the man asked for was a bouquet of flowers for his wife.
A few weeks later Trump sent the flowers with a note that read: We've paid off your mortgage.}

 

_{•
In 1996, Trump filed a lawsuit against the city of Palm Beach , Florida , accusing the town of discriminating against his Mar-a-Lago resort club because it allowed Jews and blacks. Abraham Foxman, who was the Anti-Defamation League Director at the time, said
Trump put the light on Palm Beach not on the beauty and the glitter, but on its seamier side of discrimination. Foxman also noted that Trump's charge had a trickle-down effect because other clubs followed his lead and began admitting Jews and blacks.}

 

_{•
In 2000, Maury Povich featured a little girl named Megan who struggled with Brittle Bone Disease on his show and Trump happened to be watching. Trump said the little girl's story and positive attitude touched his heart. So he contacted Maury and gifted the
little girl and her family with a very generous check.}

 

_{•
In 2008, after Jennifer Hudson's family members were tragically murdered in Chicago , Trump put the Oscar-winning actress and her family up at his Windy City hotel for free. In addition to that, Trump's security took extra measures to ensure Hudson and her
family members were safe during such a difficult time.}

 

 _{•
In 2013, New York bus driver Darnell Barton spotted a woman close to the edge of a bridge staring at traffic below as he drove by He stopped the bus, got out and put his arm around the woman and savedher life by convincing her to not jump. When Trump heard about this story, he sent the hero bus driver a check simply because he believed his good deed deserved to be rewarded.}

 

 _{•
In 2014, Trump gave $25,000 to Sgt. Andrew Tamoressi after he spent
seven months in a Mexican jail for accidentally crossing the US-Mexico border. President Barack Obama couldn't even be bothered to make onephone call to assist with the United States Marine's release; however, Trump opened his pocketbook to help this serviceman get back on his feet.}

 

 _{•
In 2016, Melissa Consin Young attended a Trump rally and tearfully thanked Trump for changing her life. She said she proudly stood on stage with Trump as Miss Wisconsin USA in 2005.  However, years later she found herself struggling with an incurable illness
and during her
darkest days she explained that she received a handwritten letter from Trump telling her she's the bravest woman, I know. She said the opportunities that she got from Trump and his organizations ultimately provided her Mexican-American son with a full-ride
to college.}

 

_{•
Lynne Patton, a black female executive for the Trump Organization, released a statement in 2016 defending her boss against accusations that he's a racist and a bigot. She tearfully revealed how she's struggled with substance abuse and addiction for years.
Instead of kicking her to the curb, she said the Trump Organization and his entire family loyally stood by her through immensely difficult times.}

 

_{Donald
Trump's kindness knows no bounds and his generosity has and continues to touch the lives of people from every sex, race and religion. When Trump sees someone in need, he wants to help. Two decades ago, Oprah asked Trump in a TV interview if he'd run for president.
He said:  If it got so bad, I would never want to rule it out totally, because I really am tired of seeing what's happening with this country.}

 

_{That
day has come.}

 

_{Trump sees that America is in need and he wants to help How unthinkable!On the other hand. have you ever heard of Hillary or Obama ever doing such things with their own resources?Now that's really unthinkable!  Might be worth passing on!!!}

The Dominion of injustice

The democrats are pretending that James Comey did nothing wrong. What a pack of lies they are peddling. James Comey was in control of the so-called “hillary email investigation”. James Comey and his band of Hillary brown shirts first project was to find everyone that was even remotely involved with Hillary’s emails. Why? They then fell all over themselves granting immunity to every one of them. A real investigation does not grant immunity to every possible suspect before even gathering facts. These immunities were granted so that Hillary could be certain that no one would panic for fear of prosecution and spill the beans. The democrats will try to tell you that there is nothing wrong with granting every possible suspect immunity. That’s a crock!

Then Comey and Stryzok combined their efforts to write a letter declaring that Hillary was innocent of any wrongdoing. THEY WROTE THIS LETTER TWO MONTHS BEFORE EVEN DOING ANY INTERVIEWS. Now is that the way to conduct an investigation? Declare the suspect innocent even before talking to them. But the democrats will tell you that they can see nothing wrong with this.

Then they did an interview with Hillary. No, it did not qualify as “questioning” because first of all they did not question her under oath. In addition, they took no video or notes during the interview. Of course, the democrats will continue to insist that they can see nothing wrong. Such hogwash!

Then they issued a subpoena for Hillary’s emails. Now that sounds like a reasonable thing to do, right? Of course, by this time Hillary had already gotten the message that the fix was in! So, she gave the subpoena the one-finger salute and deleted 33,000 emails that she declared the FBI had no right to see. She deleted all 33,000 emails and purchased special software to ensure that the emails could never be recovered. Does that sound like the actions of a crook destroying evidence? Now what do you think would happen to you if you were issued a subpoena for documents, and you told the FBI they could not have the documents? Right! Then you would be prosecuted for obstruction of justice, but not Hillary. James Comey and his cohort Stryzok did not even protest! They said NOTHING about Hillary’s unlawful destruction of subpoenaed documents! Now the democrats will again tell you that anyone can refuse to comply with a subpoena for documents just like Hillary did, and that they see nothing wrong with her actions. They will also try to defend Comey’s non-action. Even a low-grade moron can easily see that Hillary’s cover-up and Comey’s cover-up assistance were corruption of justice. Even a first-year law student would be successful in prosecuting Hillary for obstruction of justice.

Even with the fix in from Comey, and the “permission” to destroy evidence, Hillary still needed more help from Comey. She did not do a complete job of destroying all of the classified documents she had on her unsecured server. So she was still vulnerable to being prosecuted, but it was Comey to the rescue one more time. He made statements to the effect that there was only a small number of classified documents found, and muddied the water by implying that there had to be “intent” on her part for her to be charged. Baloney! At least one of the laws by which she could have been charged did not require any kind of intent, and even one classified document on an unsecured server was sufficient for charges to be filed.

Oh, and in addition, there was also the instances of Hillary beating her phones into little pieces as her response to the subpoena. Of course, the democrats will tell you that everyone beats their phones into little pieces before releasing them to the FBI. To quote the democrats, “So what did Hillary or Comey do wrong?”

James Comey should have been fired for at least gross incompetence. In my opinion, there were so many instances of obstruction of justice, he should be headed to prison right now. Anyone in James Comey’s position who committed the actions that he did would have been fired, and prosecuted for felonies committed!!!

Then the height of hypocrisy was committed by Hillary. After all of the collusion and illegal aid provided to her by James Comey, she actually made public statements asserting that he caused her to lose the election. What gratitude!!!

Last of all, Comey’s current comments regarding FBI integrity, and his implying that he actually has any personal integrity is sickening. If I were an FBI agent aware of all of the unlawful and immoral actions Comey has committed, I would be furious to hear him speak as if he and I were “brothers”.

Tit for Tat

_{President Obama used executive orders to short-circuit laws he did not like. Another way of stating it is to say that he purposely stopped enforcing laws which were legally implemented by congress. To be more explicit, by refusing to enforce laws, he was effectively writing his own laws. This is certainly not the way the founders intended our government to work. However, his executive orders did become the “Law of the land”. He accomplished this in some cases by defining his executive orders as “selective enforcement” which he claimed was allowed by “executive privilege”.}

_{Ok, since Obama set the precedent of using “executive privilege” in this manner, then it logically follows that President Trump can also use the same executive privilege to suspend the enforcement of some laws. “Selective enforcement” is really supposed to be used when there are limited resources to enforce a given law. So why not use this in a similar manner to accomplish President Trump’s immigration policies which the democrats are stonewalling.}

_{Point number one, in order to provide adequate border security until the wall is built, there is a need to allocate additional ICE officers for border security, and the upgrading of border “barriers”. In addition, there is the need to allocate additional ICE officers to provide “special enforcement” of immigration laws in “sanctuary areas”. There is a need for more ICE resources to destroy the MS13 gangs and other similar groups. It is logical to take the following actions to reallocate immigration resources.}

_{Suspend all “lottery immigration” and “chain immigration” activities thereby freeing up resources which can be reassigned. Drastically reduce the number of legal immigrants who will be allowed access into the U.S. to free up more ICE resources. The resources freed up by these actions will be reassigned to upgrading border “barriers”, increased ICE enforcement in “sanctuary areas”, and dealing with criminal activities by illegal aliens with emphasis on gangs and drug dealers. This reallocation of ICE resources should remain in place until the border wall is built and the “sanctuary area” requirements are no longer needed.}

Democrat leaders do not care!!!!

I hope that you watched the State Of The Union message on January 31. There is absolutely no excuse for the way the democrats acted. Yes, I know that the democrat leaders are motivated by only hate for President Trump, and that they are totally uncaring about anything or anyone that suffers harm as they pursue their mission of hate. As an aside, we also know that the democratic leaders couldn’t care less about American citizens who are harmed by illegal aliens. Even given all that, it is beyond disgusting that when President Trump introduced the parents of two teenage girls who were raped and beaten to death by MS-13 gang members with baseball bats, the democrats sat in their chairs and refused to even acknowledge the pain and suffering that these parents have suffered. Yes, you heard me right, no sympathy at all. I also noticed that Nancy Pelosi was looking around the room at that time for any democrats who showed any sympathy. Obviously, the democrat dictators would severely punish any democrat that even appears to support the notion that two teenage American lives have any meaning.