Mueller is off limits

Mueller is setting the stage to open up Trump’s entire life to his never-ending fishing expedition in search of something that can be used to impeach President Trump. Trump’s life before his campaign for President should be off-limits to any investigation by Mueller because Mueller lacks any kind of legal justification or probable cause to warrant such an invasion of privacy. In regards to this, it should be noted that the reason that Jeff Sessions recused himself from involvement with Mueller’s investigation was because Jeff felt that it was improper for him to be involved with an investigation of the Trump campaign because he had been a part of the Trump campaign. If Mueller wants to try to investigate any part of President Trump’s life prior to the campaign, then Jeff Sessions can “UNRECUSE HIMSELF”. There is no possible conflict of interest for Jeff Sessions regarding an investigation before the presidential campaign WHEN JEFF SESSIONS WAS NOT INVOLVED WITH TRUMP!!

If I were Jeff Sessions, and Mueller attempts to expand the investigation to all of President Trump’s life, I would “UNRECUSE” myself and terminate this perpetual political witch hunt. It has become undeniably obvious that the purpose of the “special counsel” is defined entirely as a purely political hatchet job intended to continue, forever if necessary, until something is found to damage President Trump.

California Dreamers

You could not pay me enough money to live in California. The Governor has proudly announced that he will pardon illegal aliens who have committed crimes to ensure that they do not have to comply with American laws. The mayor of Oakland has publically announced that she is assisting illegal criminal aliens to evade capture by warning them of impending ICE raids. Illegal aliens kill American citizens on city streets with little concern for being held accountable. Miles of city streets in multiple California cities are lined with cardboard boxes being used as homes for the homeless. Those same sidewalks are crowded with human feces and stains of dried urine, and the California government turns a blind eye to the problem because they are too busy moving even more illegal aliens into cardboard box homes on the adjoining streets. The Hollywood elite, the political elite, and the Silicon Valley elite live in their mansions far away from the growing ghetto, safely protected by their walls around their estates and their private army of armed guards. California is quickly degenerating into the same cesspool as the third-world countries from which they are importing the illegal aliens.

If you are a legal American citizen in California, be aware that the government has determined that you are lower in rank and value than the illegal aliens. Be aware that your only role is to pay the bill for taking care of the flood of illegal aliens. If you are one of the unfortunate American citizens to have lost your job to an illegal alien, be sure to say thank you to the democrats running your state.

Last of all, be aware that California will soon be implementing a new policy to insure that these same illegal aliens will also be allowed to register to vote. Yes, that is true. California began to set up the scenario when they started issuing drivers licenses to everyone in the state, regardless of their legal status. Now, California is going to automatically send out forms to register to vote when the driver license must be renewed. Yes, the “official” fantasy is that there will be checks put into place to ensure that the “driver” is an American citizen before registering him to vote. FAT CHANCE! If you are an American citizen who still lives in California, I have a word of advice. Get out while you can before California passes laws allowing the illegals to legally steal from you!

Re: gun control

In 1865, a  Democrat shot and killed Abraham Lincoln, President of the United States  .

In 1881, a  left wing radical Democrat shot James Garfield, President of the United  States - who later died from the wound.
 
In 1963, a  radical left wing socialist shot and killed John F. Kennedy, President  of the United States.

In 1975, a  left wing radical Democrat fired shots at Gerald Ford, President of the  United States.

In 1983, a  registered Democrat shot and wounded Ronald Reagan, President of the  United States.
 
In 1984,  James Hubert, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 22 people in a  McDonalds restaurant.
 
In 1986,  Patrick Sherrill, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 15 people in  an Oklahoma post office.

In 1990,  James Pough, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 10 people at a GMAC  office.
 
In 1991,  George Hennard, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 23 people in a  Luby's cafeteria in Killeen , TX.
 
In 1995,  James Daniel Simpson, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 5  coworkers in a Texas laboratory.

In 1999,  Larry Asbrook, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 8 people at a  church service.
 
In 2001, a  left wing radical Democrat fired shots at the White House in a failed  attempt to kill George W. Bush, President of the US.

In 2003,  Douglas Williams, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people at a  Lockheed Martin plant.
 
In 2007, a  registered Democrat named Seung - Hui Cho, shot and killed 32 people in Virginia Tech.
 
In 2010, a  mentally ill registered Democrat named Jared Lee Loughner, shot Rep.  Gabrielle Giffords and killed 6 others.

In 2011, a  registered Democrat named James Holmes, went into a movie theater and  shot and killed 12 people.

In 2012,  Andrew Engeldinger, a disgruntled Democrat, shot and killed 7 people in  Minneapolis.

In 2013, a  registered Democrat named Adam Lanza, shot and killed 26 people in a  school in Newtown ,CT.

As  recently as Sept 2013, an angry Democrat shot 12 at a Navy ship  yard.
 

Clearly,  there is a problem with Democrats and guns.

Not  one NRA member, Tea Party member, or Republican conservative was  involved in any of these shootings and murders.

SOLUTION:

It  should be illegal for Democrats to own guns.

We  don't need gun control, we need Democrat control.

Guns  don't kill people, Democrats do!

justice be damned, politics be served

Everyone knows that the Dimms have only one agenda, obstruction of anything that President Trump wants to do, regardless of the inherent value of the activity. Their cohorts, the dishonest liberal media, share the same agenda with the additional caveat, they want to present everything about President Trump in a negative manner, even if it means writing total lies about him. In the Dimms desperate attempts to obstruct or destroy anything positive about President Trump, they will do anything if they feel it will help their efforts. Let me repeat that in different words, they do not care if their actions are moral or legal as long as the result hinders President Trump's efforts.

With that understanding, I will advance the following conclusion. The Dimm’s leadership does not care if their actions harm America or destroy the foundations on which our country is based just as long as it successfully obstructs President Trump. In addition, it is also true that the Dimm’s leadership does not appear to have any concern for the destruction of American foundational principles which occurs as “collateral” damage in their pursuit of their far-left agenda. The opposition to President Trump has now been spawned within the judicial system by the Dimms so that court decisions being rendered have little or nothing to do with current written law. Instead, the left-wing federal judges are issuing decisions based on nothing but the left-wing opposition to Trump. These rogue judges are demonstrating extremely “bad behavior” by using their power for strictly political purposes and showing downright contempt for written laws. The resulting destruction of the very fabric of the American judicial system obviously does not concern the radical left-wing judges intent on their purely political agenda. Their rallying cry is “Justice be damned, politics be served!”. It is a continuation of the corruption of every facet of government by the left-wing radicals which was proliferated during the Obama regime, and now is trying to corrupt every facet of our government.

judge shopping by the Dimms

I have been following the Dimm’s process of judge-shopping to find judges biased against President Trump’s executive orders. The Dimms file a motion in a lower-level federal court that the Dimms know is biased against the executive order. The biased federal court prevents the executive order from being implemented until the lower level court decision is reversed by a higher court with the final act being to appeal to the Supreme Court, if necessary. It is obvious that the Dimms only objective is obstruction simply for the sake of obstruction. I have a couple of questions.

The first question is as follows: Since the law states clearly that in immigration matters, the President has the authority to limit access into the U.S. for anyone, then how can these lower level judges claim to have any authority to pass judgement on a presidential executive order regarding immigration? Where in the constitution does it say that lower level judges have been granted more power than the President? Where in the law does it say that anyone has the right to usurp the President’s authority in an area where he has been granted final authority by statute?

That then leads into my second question. When judges make decisions that are not based on the law, those judges are acting in a corrupt manner, which is totally counter to what they were expressly assigned to do. Judges are not placed in authority to make capricious or arbitrary decisions. Their job is to determine what the law says is the proper decision regarding the matter be decided. According to Article III of the constitution, a judge’s tenure may be terminated if the judge does not exercise “good behavior”. It is clearly obvious that they intended that judges should be held accountable and measured by “behavior standards”. I think that there must be a process in place that will ensure that any judge that does not exhibit “good behavior” may have his tenure terminated. One of the criteria defining “good behavior” should be that the judge’s decisions should be in keeping with current written law. Perhaps a position of Judicial Inspector General reporting to both congress and the DOJ should be instituted to handle investigations of “bad behavior” of judges. It is quite obvious that the process of “judge shopping” to file lawsuits, and motions needs to be curtailed. Also, a judicial branch where the law changes every time a different judge is involved is not indicative of the actual existence of meaningful government by law. Instead it is indicative of government by junior level dictators who are issuing decisions based on their own arbitrary biases.

attaboy for Trump

Its official, first year of President Trump's administration achieved 3% GDP, something Obama never came close to in his whole 8 years in office. In addition, unemployment claims dropped to a 43 year low this month. I have previously mentioned the fact that unemployment figures for Hispanic and blacks are at historic lows, but I feel it must be restated. President Trump's success stories are completely ignored by the "liberal" trump-hating media, CNN and MSNBC being the worst offenders. Many economists are now beginning to say that if President Trump's economic agenda is fully implemented, it is very possible to see a consistent 3% or better GDP for the next decade. BUT BE AWARE THAT IF THE DEMOCRATS HAVE THEIR WAY, THEY WILL SABATOGE THE ACHEIVEMENT OF THIS GOAL.THEY WILL, IF THEY ARE ABLE, REINSTATE EXCESSIVE REGULATIONS TO CHOKE BUSINESSES, AND EXCESSIVE TAXES TO PROMOTE THE WELFARE STATE THEY WANT. THE DIMMS HAVE NO PLAN FOR AMERICAN SUCCESS. THEY ARE THE PARTY OF ZERO PROGRESS, ZERO COOPERATION, AND ZERO INTEREST IN WORKING FOR THE GOOD OF AMERICA.

was obama involved

There has been a good deal of information released about the Steele dossier and subsequent events in the last weeks. Using this information combined with an understanding of the people who were or might have been involved in the events, I would like to reconstruct what may have actually transpired. Since there is a dedicated effort to obfuscate and cover-up the truth, it is necessary to make some logical assumptions to facilitate this reconstruction.

First of all, I think that one can look at the past actions of the individuals involved and make accurate assessments of their motives which has some predictive value of what they would think and do. We know that Hillary assumed total control of the DNC finances very quickly upon entering the presidential campaign. Given this, it is plainly obvious that she was completely aware of the expenditure of 12 million dollars to create the Steele dossier. We know that Hillary mounted smear campaigns against many people in the past. As a matter of fact, her favorite method of dealing with her opponents is the extensive use of smear campaigns. It is a fact that the information contained within the dossier is not verified, and the allegations are downright sleazy. How did Hillary guarantee that the dossier would be a smear campaign? She insured that the person hired to compile the dossier hated Trump. Mr Steele expressed his hatred for Trump and his desperation to prevent Trump from becoming president in documents he wrote. I will refer to the dossier he created as the Steele dossier, and it consists of propaganda from Russian sources, third and fourth-hand accusations, and most of its content has be totally debunked.

Now it gets more interesting. Everyone knows that Obama was very committed to Hillary being elected president. He even went on the campaign trail for her. It is my contention that he was much more involved than simply campaigning. Pause for a little Obama history. Obama has demonstrated over and over that he fully supports the first rule of third-world dictators. Stated as simply as possible, that rule is that all of the government agencies and resources have one true purpose, which is to destroy or diminish the political opponents of the dictator. A common term describes this as “weaponizing”. Obama weaponized the IRS to cripple the fund-raising capabilities of his political opponents, the GOP. Obama weaponized the EPA to destroy the coal industry in America. Obama weaponized the DOJ to protect his fellow democrats and to file prosecutions against his political opponents. There is no reason to list all of the examples. Even one instance is sufficient to show Obama’s misuse of government resources.

Back to the developing story regarding Obama’s involvement with the fantasy document called the Steele dossier. Part of the weaponizing process had also included the corruption of some of the higher-level FBI. The result of this corruption was that there were people in positions of great power who believed that it was their job to decide who would be the next president. In other words, they thought it was their sacred duty to destroy the political opponents of Obama’s regime. One of these corrupted FBI officials was married to a woman who worked at the firm that was involved with creating the Steele dossier. They both knew that the dossier was a smear job created by the DNC, and they were aware that the accusations in the dossier were totally unsubstantiated. That did not stop them from using the dossier to fraudulently obtain a fisa warrant to spy on the Trump campaign communications. They tried to use the information illegally obtained to derail Trump’s campaign effort, and when that failed, they used the dossier to set up a witch-hunt called a special investigation as a totally open-ended “fishing expedition” to find some kind of a crime that President Trump can be impeached for. Given the reputation of some members of this group of “lawyers”, you can be sure that there is no law that they will be unwilling to “bend” to manufacture some kind of a criminal indictment. And how can I believe that Obama was involved with or even leading this third-world “coup” effort. There are documents which have been discovered showing that Obama was aware of these activities as they were happening. The only question is, how deep was his involvement?