was obama involved

There has been a good deal of information released about the Steele dossier and subsequent events in the last weeks. Using this information combined with an understanding of the people who were or might have been involved in the events, I would like to reconstruct what may have actually transpired. Since there is a dedicated effort to obfuscate and cover-up the truth, it is necessary to make some logical assumptions to facilitate this reconstruction.

First of all, I think that one can look at the past actions of the individuals involved and make accurate assessments of their motives which has some predictive value of what they would think and do. We know that Hillary assumed total control of the DNC finances very quickly upon entering the presidential campaign. Given this, it is plainly obvious that she was completely aware of the expenditure of 12 million dollars to create the Steele dossier. We know that Hillary mounted smear campaigns against many people in the past. As a matter of fact, her favorite method of dealing with her opponents is the extensive use of smear campaigns. It is a fact that the information contained within the dossier is not verified, and the allegations are downright sleazy. How did Hillary guarantee that the dossier would be a smear campaign? She insured that the person hired to compile the dossier hated Trump. Mr Steele expressed his hatred for Trump and his desperation to prevent Trump from becoming president in documents he wrote. I will refer to the dossier he created as the Steele dossier, and it consists of propaganda from Russian sources, third and fourth-hand accusations, and most of its content has be totally debunked.

Now it gets more interesting. Everyone knows that Obama was very committed to Hillary being elected president. He even went on the campaign trail for her. It is my contention that he was much more involved than simply campaigning. Pause for a little Obama history. Obama has demonstrated over and over that he fully supports the first rule of third-world dictators. Stated as simply as possible, that rule is that all of the government agencies and resources have one true purpose, which is to destroy or diminish the political opponents of the dictator. A common term describes this as “weaponizing”. Obama weaponized the IRS to cripple the fund-raising capabilities of his political opponents, the GOP. Obama weaponized the EPA to destroy the coal industry in America. Obama weaponized the DOJ to protect his fellow democrats and to file prosecutions against his political opponents. There is no reason to list all of the examples. Even one instance is sufficient to show Obama’s misuse of government resources.

Back to the developing story regarding Obama’s involvement with the fantasy document called the Steele dossier. Part of the weaponizing process had also included the corruption of some of the higher-level FBI. The result of this corruption was that there were people in positions of great power who believed that it was their job to decide who would be the next president. In other words, they thought it was their sacred duty to destroy the political opponents of Obama’s regime. One of these corrupted FBI officials was married to a woman who worked at the firm that was involved with creating the Steele dossier. They both knew that the dossier was a smear job created by the DNC, and they were aware that the accusations in the dossier were totally unsubstantiated. That did not stop them from using the dossier to fraudulently obtain a fisa warrant to spy on the Trump campaign communications. They tried to use the information illegally obtained to derail Trump’s campaign effort, and when that failed, they used the dossier to set up a witch-hunt called a special investigation as a totally open-ended “fishing expedition” to find some kind of a crime that President Trump can be impeached for. Given the reputation of some members of this group of “lawyers”, you can be sure that there is no law that they will be unwilling to “bend” to manufacture some kind of a criminal indictment. And how can I believe that Obama was involved with or even leading this third-world “coup” effort. There are documents which have been discovered showing that Obama was aware of these activities as they were happening. The only question is, how deep was his involvement?