The truth is seeping out

Despite the efforts of the liberal media to discredit the claims of surveillance of the Trump organization by the Obama administration, and the tedious denials of dubious 'intelligence sources', it appears that the diligent efforts to uncover the truth are beginning to be rewarded. They have now uncovered evidence that indicates that there was indeed unlawful surveillance of Trump and his associates. The purposeful unmasking of American citizens for the apparent purpose of politically harming Trump is a felony, and now the job becomes one of penetrating the veil of deceit and lies to determine exactly who committed the felony or perhaps multiple felonies. It will take time and strong ongoing determination because the perpetrators are well-versed in lies and cover-up, but I feel very hopeful that there will be success. However, there is one sadly true fact which is that the person most likely to have been the head perpetrator will quite possibly escape any kind of punishment. To reiterate this statement, in my opinion Obama will probably escape without any kind of punishment even though I believe that he is the one person who planned, initiated and profited most from these unlawful acts.

left wing justice - an oxymoron?

The current situation is ridiculous. We have judges with highly over-inflated egos effectively placing their authority above the authority of the President of the United States. It is exactly what one should expect from the looney left. I have one question. Is it possible to impeach these judges who are making a mockery of our justice system and our constitution?

Doesn’t it seem that the leaders of the looney left have every intention of destroying any semblance of law and order? The looney left wants to have totally open borders with unlimited drug trafficking, terrorists crossing at will, illegal weapons trading, unlimited illegals crossing our borders, and the total chaos which will be the result. The looney left does not want to protect American citizens from criminal activities of illegal aliens in our country. They have even gone to the lengths of establishing ‘legal funds’ to protect criminal illegal aliens from punishment which, by the way, will be paid for by you – the American taxpayers. The looney left is also establishing ‘legal loophole education’ paid for with your taxpayer dollars to teach the criminal illegal aliens how to avoid legal consequences of their illegal activities. The looney left intends to continue supporting ‘sanctuary cities’ as areas where illegal criminals can be assisted in hiding from authorities. Remember Kate Steinle’s murder. The looney left has effectively blocked all efforts to pass a law to protect American citizens from being murdered by illegal aliens. The wikileaks releases of the Democrats' emails clearly showed the racism, hatred, bigotry, and dishonesty of the looney left leadership. The hypocrisy of the looney left media has been clearly identified repeatedly. The dishonesty of the looney left in sneaking the debate questions to Hillary has been proven without any possibility of doubt. The criminal mindset of hiring thugs to disrupt republican events during the presidential campaign by looney left leadership has been proven as well. The litany of information clearly depicting totally immoral attitudes and actions by the looney left leadership goes on and on. How can anyone that has any respect for moral values possibly condone any of the activities by the looney left leadership? I am sure that the rank-and-file of the democratic party are mostly decent people, but how can they continue to support a leadership that is so obviously corrupt?

Spying on Trump?

I want to address the situation of ‘spying’ on President Trump and/or his campaign staff by the ‘Obama administration”. We do know that there was one application for ‘surveillance’ which was denied, and that there was one ‘FISA’ warrant granted. So, in my opinion there was an effort to obtain a warrant which ‘overstepped’ what a judge thought allowable, and then there was actual surveillance granted. I have not heard anyone address the real question. Was Trump, or Trump’s organization, or Trump’s colleagues, identified specifically in the warrant which was granted? Even more interesting to me is the question, “What was the reason that the first warrant requested was denied?” In other words, was there an effort made to establish surveillance of Trump or his associates during the presidential campaign? In my opinion, there is a real possibility that the Obama administration really did try to set up a surveillance which would have been the type of action that a police state would do.

Secondly, in my opinion, there has been a total refusal to look at the elephant in the room. All of the ‘liberal’ media comments have noted that the ‘intelligence sources’ have been stating that there is no evidence that there was a surveillance effort against Trump during the presidential campaign. I want to ask the obvious question. Are these ‘intelligence sources’ holdovers from the Obama administration? In my opinion, almost every ‘Obama scandal’ was riddled with ‘lies from Obama administration officials’.  They either lied or stonewalled or delayed every investigation until the ‘scandal’ passed. So, I am asking the obvious question. If the so-called intelligence sources are holdovers from the Obama administration, and they may have even be complicit in the ‘surveillance’ effort, why should I have any faith in what they tell me?

Still twisting facts!!!!!

The recent articles in the ‘liberal’ media regarding ‘illegals’ are really laughable in their ‘twisting’ the facts in their attempts to present a purely negative view of President Trump. For instance, there has been extensive reporting by all of the ‘liberal’ media about ‘immigration raids’ recently. The intent of the articles is transparent in their obvious effort to present President Trump as ‘hateful’ because, “do I dare express the unthinkable”, he is enforcing the existing immigration laws. The outrage of the ‘liberal’ media overflows because, as they imply, President Trump’s enforcement of existing immigration laws is ‘cruel’ and ‘racist’. Guess what, the term illegal means illegal, which means they have broken the law, which means that they deserve the consequences of breaking the law.

But now for the ‘humorous’ part! The same ‘liberal’ media does not want to acknowledge any kind of success for President Trump. Therefore, they are trying to discount the very large drop in illegals since President Trump has been in office. As you can easily confirm, the number of illegals has been cut almost in half since he has been in office. The same ‘liberals’ that scream about President Trump’s ‘overbearing’ immigration efforts will not acknowledge that his efforts ARE DIMINISHING the number of illegals. It is a ridiculous position for the ‘liberals’ to take. On one hand, they complain loudly about the roundup of illegals and renewed deportation procedures, and on the other hand they expound the exact opposite view, i.e. he is doing nothing to cause the undeniable drop in illegals! How can anyone reading the garbage being expounded by the ‘liberal’ media actually believe any of their ‘journalists’?

Wire-tapping??

It appears that the ‘Obama Administration’ may have instituted policies of a ‘police state’. For those of you who may not really understand what the term ‘police state’ means, here is a nutshell description. The Nazis had the ‘police’ monitor the population, especially anyone who appeared to oppose the Nazi regime. This included spying on ‘enemies of the motherland’, arresting ‘enemies’, and using any illegally obtained information to damage or destroy these ‘enemies’. The Nazi police was called the SS. A police state is dedicated to ensuring that there is no freedom of speech or freedom of thoughts for anyone in the country. Now let’s get back to the appearance of the Obama police state. It may be possible that the Obama administration used an FISA court order to possibly initiate wire taps against Donald Trump DURING THE PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGN. The thought is chilling. It is the action of a total police state reminiscent of the police states set up by many of the dictators of the past, such as Hitler and Stalin. For a sitting president to initiate, permit, or even have knowledge of it without taking action against it is inconceivable in our country. This is the type of action associated with a third-world dictator. In my opinion, this is not surprising at all. Looking at the IRS scandal of the Obama administration, one can see plainly the actions of a police state which was intended to diminish or destroy the political opponents of the Obama Regime. If you have forgotten, the IRS under Obama’s direction initiated a discriminatory policy of denying conservative political groups the tax status to which they were lawfully entitled. Under the Obama administration, there was ZERO consequences for those who initiated and/or participated in the political discrimination against conservative groups. Although there was no outcry of ‘police state’ practices at that time, there should have been! The revelation of dictatorial state police activities under the Obama regime should not surprise anyone!   

However, it is important to acknowledge some very obvious facts. It is my opinion that Obama is very devious and ingenious in the methods he has employed in the past to accomplish his objectives. It is only logical that if he actually did pursue an objective of wire-tapping the Trump organization, he would have used his usual devious and difficult-to-prove techniques. If there was a FISA warrant obtained, I believe that Obama would have gone to extensive length to provide himself with ‘plausible deniability’ to ensure that he could not be prosecuted for the crime. In addition, Obama corrupted the very mechanisms and organizations which are in place to prevent such actions. So, finding anyone who will be willing to testify from the Obama administration (read that as Obama brown shirts) will be extremely difficult. Based on past experience, the perpetrators, if any, will either lie about what happened or find some way to avoid giving any testimony (remember Eric Holder). If there are still ‘Obama brown shirts’ in the government offices (I believe that there are plenty), you can be sure that they are very busy destroying any physical evidence that would prove that the wire-tapping did occur.

Thanks and praise to Liberty Advisor Group

I commend the swift and proper action taken by Liberty Advisor Group in regards to the disgusting tweet by Mister Daniel Grilo. Terminating his employment was totally justified, and decrying his disgusting comment was the right and proper action. President Trump made the special effort to recognize Navy Seal William “Ryan” Owens who gave his life while performing his patriotic duty. This recognition was very well deserved and totally appropriate. The looney left would have been on their knees praising the action if it had been done by Obama. The tweet by Danial Grilo is typical of the looney left who are willing to hurt anyone in any way in their efforts to harm President Trump. It is a perfect example of the total insensitivity of the looney left. It is my fervent hope that any future hateful actions or rhetoric by the hate-mongering looney left is met with similar swift and appropriate actions. It is long past the time for the looney left to quit their ongoing hate campaign against President Trump.

liberal media - a definition

The so-called ‘liberal’ media has a very good understanding of the following principles of misdirection and ‘persuasion’.

The first principle is that any lie can be made to sound like the truth if yelled loud enough and long enough. For instance, it is easy to make the accusation that anyone is a ‘racist’. Then, once you have established the idea into your readers minds, then at every available instance from that time on, you repeat the accusation very loudly even if there has been nothing done that even remotely resembles racism. It is enough to recite examples of other people (totally unrelated to the person being accused) who had racist ideas and simply suggest that there ‘could be’ a similarity.

The second principle is that if you sling enough dirt and dirty feces at anyone, there is the possibility that something may stick. When employing this principle, it is necessary for the ‘slinger’ to pay close attention to the impact the feces are having on the victim. If there are no feces sticking to the victim, then the ‘slinger’ must quickly move on to slinging different smelling feces. This principle works well in conjunction with the third principle mentioned next.

The third principle is to ensure that every day, there is some new accusation. Again, it does not need to have any relationship to truth or reality. The purpose is to create a psychological ‘smell’ around the victim that will instill one’s readers with the impression that there must be something wrong with the victim, because ‘everything about the person is negative’.

The fourth principle is to totally dismiss and ensure that nothing positive about the victim is ever published. This is important because reporting something positive might very well diminish the effects produced when using principle three above.

The fifth principle is to attribute motives to the victim which are guaranteed to produce a negative evaluation of the victim. The classic example of this was when Clinton demeaned Trump by saying with a mocking tone, ‘We all know what making America great again means.”, with the obvious implication that Trump is a racist. Since you all know that Clinton used exactly the same words when he was President, it is ridiculous to think that Clinton’s use of the phrase was ‘good’ while Trump’s use of the phrase was ‘racist’.

The last principle is to have a ready list of hateful names and labels to brand the victim with. It really makes no difference if there is any truth inherent in the name calling, but the labels must be used to generate an unreasoning hatred of the victim. Of course, the same list can be used to attack anyone different than the writer, or holding different views than the writer.